“deluge” of interview requests so “huge”, Noam Chomsky must turn down interviews
Hello Dr. Chomsky,
I would thank to thank you for your time. I have hereafter included a list of questions for syndication.
I thought long about these questions and I hope you are fancied to answer them, as I have read much of your work over the years and have taken a great deal of your philosophy quite seriously.
What do you consider to be the central motif during the juncture of American history to which you bore witness?
do you foresee a collapse of the American Empire and US Dollar as do so many analysts today?
Who do you consider to be “the managers” of the global economy? How did these individuals earn such positions of power?
There is much speculation and philosophy that families such as the Rothschilds and Rockefellers “control” the world. Do you find any accuracy in such a statement?
Why is the term 99% and 1%, as adopted by the Occupy Movement metaphorical and not literal, as you have suggested?
what brings you joy in life?
Dr. Chomsky then replied, with no signature or email flare prescribed to by the neo-businessmen, crusading for more business and business only, in plain English.
Appreciate the invitation, but I’m afraid the deluge of requests for interviews has become so huge that I’m compelled to put off any new ones for several months at least. Just no choice
Hello Dr. Chomsky,
That is great news. I am delighted to hear that ourcollective philosophy of a more harmonious world is receiving the attention it deserves. It is my feeling that elitist plans have reached such darkly greedy levels, that the populist-reaction (i.e. law of physics) will be a “deluge” of thoughtful individuals who are concerned with the way things are. I look forward to carrying the lessons of you and countless others before and parallel to me on in the days, months, years, decades and centuries before us, as we try to reorient the so-called “global economy,” a euphemism for mankind.
I wish you all the best, Dr. Chomsky, and thank you not for the facts, but for the truth.